Beyond XXL – Slim Monopiles for Deep-Water Wind Farms

By Steelwind Nordenham.

XXL-Monopiles have been successfully used for water depths of up to 40 metres. Now wind farm developers need monopiles “beyond XXL”.

Evolution

“At the beginning of this decade nobody could image that 10 MW turbines and XXL-monopiles will be state of the art in offshore wind foundations and now we are even ahead of this”, commented Ralf Hubo and Alexander Morber, managing directors of Steelwind Nordenham.

The extension of the range is needed, mainly to enable the use of larger turbines, deeper water, and harsher environmental situations.

Monopile „Beyond XXL“: Yunlin Offshore Wind Farm (Weight: 1.732 t, Diameter: 8 m, Length: 93 m); Source: Steelwind Nordenham, FHI Corporation

Monopile main design drivers:

  • Turbines of up to 15 megawatts with rotor diameters of up to 230 metres.
  • Extreme wind loads, especially those driven by hurricanes or typhoons.
  • Water depths of up to 65 metres.
  • Wave loads in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

These requirements lead to monopile designs with bottom diameters between 8 and 11 metres, lengths of up to 120 metres and wall thicknesses up to 150 millimetres. The final weight of such monopiles can reach up to 2,400 tonnes.

This monopile design automatically induces the idea of design and fabrication optimisation to ensure that monopiles continue to lead the ranking of most economical foundation systems.

One of the topics is the reduction of the weight of the monopile. Apart from use of higher strength steel in some highly stressed cans very often fatigue design aspects are preventing the general use of these steels. Another option for weight savings is the increase of the Ø/t-ratio resulting in more “slender” monopiles. This development requires detailed analyses for several design topics, but as well for a number of fabrication aspects. “The whole fabrication process has to be adapted for a safe and economic fabrication of slender monopiles „beyond XXL”.

Design studies

Design studies have been done with different water depth, soil conditions and turbines up to 15 MW with their individual stiffness requirements.

Conventional pile designs usually adopt limited slenderness ratios of Ø/t = 100 to 120 due to reasons of pile driving. This would lead to pile masses far beyond 2.400 tonnes, while the utilization ratios in the operating state are below 65 per cent. In the studies the slenderness ratio Ø/t was varied from 100 up to 190.

The results are that monopiles with slenderness ratios up to 160 are realistically feasible and applicable for deep waters and large turbines. The diameter can reach up to 11 metres and the pile weight can reach up to 2,000 tonnes under given conditions.

After the extensive design feasibility studies, two main questions became relevant:

  • How to fabricate such kind of slender monopiles “beyond XXL” ?
  • How to handle such kind of slender monopiles “beyond XXL” ?

Fabrication studies

Fabrication of monopiles starts from flat steel plates being cold formed to cans. The can has to be supported by suitable support points without being damaged. Left picture in Figure 1 shows a typical stress distribution due to dead weight (can with slenderness of 160, FEM analysis).

Local bending and hoop stresses increase with slenderness if the slenderness exceeds Ø/t = 100. The distance of the roller supports from the edge of the can or section and the width of the roller supports plays a significant role to avoid plastic deformation. On the other hand, Hertzian stresses in the contact area of can and roller support have to be considered when using steel support rolls.

Figure 1: Allowable section masses on a roller support due to local stresses

Deformations can occur due to dead weight as well as on roller supports only. Figure 2 shows the maximum deflections of cans or sections on the roller supports depending on their diameter and slenderness ratio. The more slender the cans, the more this effect causes problems during later assembly of the pile. Additional support structures are necessary to keep the round shape of the cans.

Figure 2: Maximum deflection of cans or sections at increasing diameter and slenderness

Transport and storage

The cans are transported during fabrication, often done by cranes and C-beams. Similar to the situation on the roller supports, the dead weight of a can induces high local bending stresses at the contact line to the C-beam where plastic deformations can occur in particular for slender components.

Figure 3 shows the results of the assessment for this load case, carried out for cans with diameters between 10 and 12 metres. The risk of plastic deformations exists already for mild-slenderness ratios. The lifting device have to be adapted in an appropriate way.

Figure 3: Derivation of limit slenderness of cans for lifting with C-beams

Support structure during further fabrication steps have been analysed as well. Intermediate sections and monopiles beyond 600 to 1200 tonnes usually have to be supported at two or more points.

The optimum position of the supports for heavy monopiles resulting in uniform support forces would be as shown in Figure 4. Especially for support points near conical transitions with a stiffening effect of the cone leads to higher stresses at such support points.

Figure 4: Optimum positions of support points for heavy monopiles

As demonstrated by these examples, a very thorough planning of fabrication, transport and storage operations is needed for slender monopiles “beyond XXL”. This requires detailed “pre-production” to avoid later damage.

Monopiles beyond XXL need teamwork

Design of slender and large monopiles “beyond XXL” is possible. New “random conditions” for fabrication resulting from this have to be respected:

  • Take care of the type and positioning of support structures.
  • Take care of the handling devices.
  • Take care of additional stiffening support structures.
  • Take care of special transport and storage conditions.

If not carefully taken into account, the new random conditions for fabrication may lead to severe damage. Heavy investments is often necessary for adaptation of fabrication processes up to the installation process.

Investments and additional fabrication hours both can cause significant cost increases. A balance can only be found if the fabrication process is integrated part of the design phase as early as possible. Keeping this in mind, the design and fabrication of monopiles “beyond XXL” are a further part of the monopile success story.

NOTE: This article has been produced by Steelwind Nordenham and it originally appeared in the Offshore WIND Magazine 4/2019. 

Photo: Steelwind Nordenham, FHI Corporation

Related news

List of related news articles