The Commission found that the contract amendments sought by the Empire/Beacon, Sunrise, and ACENY petitions were not in the best interest of the State’s ratepayers.
On a monthly bill basis, granting the request to amend the executed contracts outside the competitive procurement process would have resulted in as high as 6.7 per cent increases for residential customers and as high as 10.5 per cent for commercial or industrial customers on monthly bills depending on service territory and the level of relief provided — above what was already committed, the Commission said.
In its decision, the Commission said that it remains fully supportive of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, which codifies decarbonization requirements for various sectors of the economy and adopts ambitious renewable energy deployment targets, and will continue to adhere to Climate Act requirements in a manner that preserves competitive procurement processes and ensures utility rates are just and reasonable.
The Commission said that the decision reaffirms that competitive procurement is the best, most efficient way to help New York reach its goal of having at least 70 per cent of electric load served by renewable energy by 2030, development of 9,000 MW of offshore wind energy by 2035 and meeting statewide demand with zero emissions resources by 2040.
All three petitions requested an order from the Commission that would have directed NYSERDA to incorporate an adjustment mechanism into existing REC and OREC purchase and sales agreements to account for inflation and other economic impacts cited by the developers.
The petitions drew significant comments from stakeholders both supporting and opposing granting financial relief. Supporters pointed to the State’s clean energy goals and argued that relief is needed to stay on track toward achieving those goals. Opponents generally expressed concern with the increase in prices that will be borne by ratepayers and the disruption of the competitive process that was used to award these projects.
The petitions generally stated that the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have exposed the projects to unprecedented global and regional supply chain bottlenecks, high inflation, and increases in the cost of capital, driven by rising interest rates. Further, the petitions identified impacts associated with the war in Ukraine, including increased demand for renewable energy and resulting shortages and price increases for key components and equipment.
The offshore developers requested enhanced terms in their offshore renewable energy credit (OREC) contracts that would adjust for inflation, and also include interconnection cost adjustment, with the joint venture between Equinor and BP also requesting an extension of the contract by five years for the 810 MW Empire Wind 1 offshore wind farm (from 25 to 30 years).
READ MORE
In their petitions, the developers said that without price adjustments their offshore wind projects might not be able to move forward, with Ørsted and Eversource saying that without this intervention “it would not be able to obtain a final investment decision (FID) allowing it to fully construct the Project” and the Equinor-BP joint venture noting that price adjustments would “restore the Projects’ ability to attract the capital required for them to move forward”.
Follow offshoreWIND.biz on: